referred! / 2 Undoubtedly the contents of the accusations that the federal prosecutor charged in his letter to me surprised me.
In short, I intentionally misrepresented information given to me verbally by Fausto Pennestrì the federal budget to discredit the Federation and in my article I would have even accused of concealing the same 2.7 million euros.
I immediately went to re-read the article Arcosfera of "three magic numbers" to see if I had actually written such a trifle, but as everyone can easily see, obviously I have not found anything like that in my writing.
The overall figure the availability of the 2009 budget had been communicated to me in Penestrì 5 million Euros. If the amount was different, of course I could not know, because the budget is no longer submitted to the National Assembly for years, nor could they invent for the same reason.
addition, if the estimates made of the various types of expenditure were missing about 2.7 million, the fact that no one knew where they had been spent was still to be found in the "classified status" of the budget. There is no doubt that the budget had been legally certified by the auditors. Simply, many doubt whether the majority of the Federal Council and the Presidents of the Regional Committee had no idea on what items of expenditure, this figure had been distributed (real doubts personally verified in several interviews with the subjects).
Moreover, knowing Fausto Pennestrì for over 30 years and having a decades-long experience nel'analisi Budgetary FITARCO, I felt quite strange that anyone would doubt the information given to me by the same behind specific questions or that it would retract them lightly.
The accusations were so outlandish enough to trigger my curiosity to understand what the real problem, beyond the natural (?) FITARCO desire for retaliation against me.
whereupon the assurances given to me by affiliation, however, the FITARCO of Justice and the Rules of the same, I formally requested the Secretariat FITARCO all documentation relating to the case, including of course the Budget 2008 and 2009, a copy of the complaint and Penenstrì excerpt of the minutes of the Federal Council with the unanimous approval of my referral.
I had to go in person to Rome to collect the required documents, taking advantage of the occasion to check with the Secretary-General I estimate the numerical strength of staff seconded to CONI FITARCO over the years the subject of my investigation. It should be recalled that the personal and FITARCO is partly dependent and partly detached from the CONI and paid by them directly. A budgetary comparison between the budgets of different years can not therefore leave dall’ assegnazione di un valore di riferimento al personale “gratuito” in carica nell’anno.
Lasciandovi al piacere della lettura dei due documenti, vi giuro che sono rimasto letteralmente sconvolto da quanto emerso dall’analisi del Bilancio 2009.
Avevo chiesto a Penenstrì: “mi ricordo che il bilancio 2003 di quando c’ero ancora io in Consiglio federale era di circa 3,5 milioni, ora sarà ben sopra i quattro ?
La risposta era stata: “ E, no, sono più di 5 .. perché Scarzella è bravo a chiedere contributi al CONI… “
Il bilancio 2009 completo in mio possesso mostra un complessivo di 5 Milioni circa cui vanno aggiunti circa 300 Mila euro di valorizzazione del personale CONI in uso gratuito nell’anno. Circa 5,3 Milioni di Euro complessivi a disposizione, perfettamente in linea con l’informazione fornitami da Pennestrì, contro i 3,5 milioni circa del bilancio 2003.
Ma i 2,7 Milioni che ritenevo semplicemente “spesi male non si sa dove” per ben oltre 1,8 Milioni di Euro erano lì, in bella vista ul bilancio, nelle due voci Riserve e Rimanenze dello stato patrimoniale.
Ebbene sì, la nostra Federazione, che piange continuamente miseria con i Comitati Regionali, che due anni fa ha aumentato la tassa gare e tagliati i contributi arbitrali alle società, che stanzia nel 2010 solo 50 Mila Euro per contributi to plant after years of absence thereof, and that does not send full teams to travel to the World Cup because it has no funds had cash reserves at the end of 2009 to over 1.8 million that thoroughly explained the mystery of 2.7 Million.
Over 40 thousand euros of interest income from banks to emphasize the existence of budget reserve funds that carry enormous amounts of course to be the question aside for what? But that is another story.
Meanwhile, the Federal Prosecutor, received my counter-arguments, all’apparenza senza neppure leggerle approfonditamente, ha trasferito il tutto alla Commissione di Giustizia FITARCO con la
lettera che potete leggere qui .
Venerdì 22 Ottobre 2010 alle ore 10:00 presso la FITARCO avrà luogo la prima udienza presso la Commissione di Giustizia. L’udienza è pubblica ed i curiosi sono i benvenuti .
Per tutti gli altri, alla prossima puntata!