Why Are 3d Movies Always Blurry

! / 4

And here we are finally at the final episode of the telenovela to refer, who has already seen large and attentive readers in the three previous installments.

The December 3, as requested by the Committee for Justice, I re Vitorchiano being in Rome for the second hearing, at which testimony was heard Fausto Penenstrì. During the same, Pennestrì repeated almost word for word as written in its exhibits, including the statement that when he referred to the € 5 million budget in his conversation with me, they wanted as a sum of 2.5 million of revenue and 2 , 5 Million outputs.

Personally I reaffirmed once again that the financial statement for 2009 said to another, being composed of 3.3 million in revenue, 3.1 outputs, while the total availability of 2009, more revenue reserves amounted to just over 5 million.

The Federal Prosecutor's closing argument (yes, there is also the closing argument ...) I caught a bit at this point ' by surprise ... The prosecutor repeated all the allegations, including those in fact that is clearly not sustainable as the intentional misrepresentation of financial information, which added the charge of ambiguous terminology used in my blog that could have misled the readers by making them less prepared just assume the concealment of money. In practice, arguing that because the archers of the blog readers are not sufficiently prepared, they could have understood for roma toma even though it was written. He concluded by requesting the herring as sanctions four months of suspension for yours truly and 15 membership fee fine for the company to liability. In my statement

final (yes, there is also the final declaration of the accused ..), I stressed the absolute pretext of proceeding, as the documentary evidence (budget FITARCO 2009) belied all the conditions thereof, and have applied for absolution filled with formula.

The court retired to deliberate, I left the meeting room, and I spent a couple of hours in the offices FITARCO waiting. But after two hours, asked about, I discovered that the court if they had gone to lunch and then about being the 15:00 I left the airport.

From December 3rd I called several times in FITARCO to know what had happened to the ruling of the Commission of Justice. without news. During a phone call around December 20th I also noted that the terms for the clerk in charge of the proceedings under the rules of justice were well overdue, but the immediate response (obviously I was not the first to note a similar situation) was that these terms (those relating to the work of the organs of justice) were not "mandatory" but "officers" and therefore did not count ....

And come Christmas, spent with the family in fun and luckily no snow ... (single disorder, received a letter the day before, which I will then ... )

Then came New Year's Eve dinner with a decent (not worth the amount was not bad ... but ..)

Tuesday, 4 January morning I received a call from FITARCO inviting me to acknowledge receipt the mail the same day in which I was notified the decision of the Committee of Justice that you can read by clicking on the link.

I read the sentence quickly, skipping the motivations and going directly to the conclusion: 45 days suspension and a fine of 10 membership fee to the company, and I sent e-mail confirmation of receipt.

The suspension set by clicking on the day. following the notification, and then by January 5.

I will end 45 days and then on February 19, just in time in order to attend the National Assembly scheduled for 20 February 2011 in Riccione, which of course I will.

The sentence you can read it slowly and make your own idea, but in practice, it has not been accepted as obvious in front of the budget, the grievances of Penenstrì, with the differences between the figures starring as a mere misunderstanding between us two due to the brevity of the interview will be displayed.

But I was sentenced for having expressed his hand so he could give rise to misinterpretations by readers and my company was convicted simply because companies are always in FITARCO convicted of strict liability even for acts completely outside their control.

I could of course use, as the sentence leaves out nicely some of the statements made by me in court and even gives me the blame for not having gone to Rome to seek enlightenment on the budget for mere personal convenience (saving the trip), when obviously I could never do it for a budget not yet approved.

The appeal, however, would not have suspended the sentences and it would cost me another error, probably without any practical result. I am still awaiting the outcome of an appeal to the Board of Appeals One in 1997 ... 350,000 lire coin of the old as the appeal fee and then nothing at all ... Besides, the story had now taken an unexpected turn that makes it unnecessary to continue dissertations with regulations.

So I dutifully canceled my subscription to the only race calendar you want to participate Indoor Championships, The Region of Lombardy, and as I diligently managing all delegated to the Secretary of the society, organization of the race CAM 4 - February 5 to 6 included.

Intanto, la telenovela “Deferito” finisce qui, salvo sorprese, visto che mi dicono che tra Presidente e Consiglieri Fitarco ci sono stati intensi scambi di mail per raggiungere una possibile unanimità nel ricorrere loro in Appello contro la sentenza per farmi inasprire la pena, giudicata troppo lieve. Vedremo.

Ma la svolta inaspettata che ho sopra menzionato e che ha ormai cambiato i termini del contendere è stata una citazione presso il tribunale di Roma notificatami proprio la vigilia di Natale e che potete leggere seguendo il link.
La FITARCO mi aveva  fatto causa per danni di immagine e voleva da me 100.000 Euro di risarcimento.
La prima udienza è set in July.

Obviously this time is another story ...