Due anni fa, quando inviai a tutte le società FITARCO la mia presentazione come candidato al Consiglio Federale, promisi nella stessa che se eletto avrei attivato programmi specifici per l’aumento dei tesserati in Italia. Il come, derivava da uno studio che avevo fatto in relazione alla percentuale di tesserati FITARCO rispetto alla popolazione delle singole regioni italiane. Lo studio mi diceva che con interventi mirati in alcune regioni specifiche esisteva la possibilità di incrementare il numero di tesserati in quelle regioni in modo relativamente semplice.
Non sono stato eletto, and then the project has remained in my mind and in my studio computer.
But in the early days of 2011, looking at the statistics on the licensed site FITARCO, I had the idea of \u200b\u200bfishing the old study and compare the data with a licensed early 2011.
The resulting multiplication table was as follows, which you can see more easily in large format downloading it from this link.
Guys, I said, the situation has not only failed to improve in those areas is falling but apparently no escape towards complete collapse.
The data on which the analysis are as follows:
- The numbers of people in the regions (taken from Wikipedia
- numbers are enrolled at 31/12/2008 by region
- The numbers of the card at 1 / 01/2011 by region
comparisons are made:
- Among members and residents to the region between
- percentage enrolled in a region and national average
The final two indices are calculated as follows:
- The index of relative growth, is the difference between the rates card / Population
- The absolute growth rate is the percentage difference between the absolute number of members, less the amount of national decline of 8.8%
goes without saying that the green color in the table means positive situation, and red means negative situation .
The figures are impressive. If you are regions show a rate card / Population below the national average, only one of these, Calabria, shows positive growth rates. But very
4 regions have all the indicators in the negative, and certainly stands out among these Campania, in last place with a 21% growth in total, followed by the penultimate Sicily a - 15% and last but from Apulia. But if
between 2008 and 2011 the small Basilicata is the only one to emerge clearly from the "red" area, with a brilliant 42%, are gone "red" in 2011 clearly Liguria, with - 14%, Trento, Bolzano and Aosta Valley even with -29%
FITARCO If it were a company and its Regional Committees agencies representing the territory, a problem immediately arises of profitability the agencies themselves.
In particular, when some of the most populated areas of Italy such as Campania, 5.8 million inhabitants and 503 members, Sicily, 5 million inhabitants and 477 members and Puglia, 4 million people enrolled and 424 shows a trend of "selling" the product archery disastrously negative the direct intervention would be postponed.
We realize that if almost 15 million inhabitants are represented by about 1400 archers instead of the more than 5000 and only wants the national average, plus a trend of sharply negative growth, that's where the attention should be focused to get new card ?
And do not speak of socio-economic situation, why not make sense, when Basilicata and Calabria crescono, ma parliamo magari invece di situazione sclerotizzata a livello locale.
Forse, è ora di cambiare radicalmente la gestione locale FITARCO di queste Regioni, che evidentemente non stanno lavorando nella direzione della crescita generale.
Un azienda attenta al mercato, alla crescita ed al profitto, se le proprie filiali non producono, prima cambia la Dirigenza locale e poi, se proprio non si riesce a fare nulla , le chiude. Almeno, non ci saranno i profitti ma neppure le spese.
La domanda provocatoria al Consiglio Federale FITARCO è proprio questa:
Cambiamo i venditori locali o chiudiamo le agenzie?
Comunque, urgently before it is too late.
0 comments:
Post a Comment